Doubt as an element of faith

Website design By BotEap.comDoubt means that we are thinking about something. We are dealing with it. We are trying to process it and understand it. Doubting is not necessarily sinful. Unbelief is an act of the will, while doubt is born of a troubled mind and a broken heart. And even the great apostle Paul was discouraged. He wrote about this in 2 Corinthians 1:8: “For we do not want you to be ignorant, brethren, of our distress that came upon us in Asia: that we were burdened beyond our strength, so that we despaired even of the lifetime.” So if you’re struggling with self-doubt, you’re not alone.

Website design By BotEap.comLikewise, people sometimes describe a posture of doubt as a scientific attitude. However, while most working scientists will not be ashamed of their skeptical attitude and, in fact, can boast of their questioning ways in many contexts, religious thinkers, especially as theologians, tend to downplay the questioning component. faith in their religion, arguing instead that there are logical and moral aspects. rational ways by which faith can be justified.

Website design By BotEap.comIn fact, there is a respectable branch of theology, called apologetics, whose stated purpose is to defend the doctrines and dogmas of a religion on the basis of reason and rationality, either to combat those who oppose and dissent, or to persuade uncommitted souls to join. a particular faith community.

Website design By BotEap.comWe board a plane, relying on the skill and sobriety of the pilot. This is essentially what we call trust. In many cases, we simply have no choice. Nothing happens by itself, that is, every observed event has a cause. However, the scientific enterprise accepts them as true. These also fall under the category of faith.

Website design By BotEap.comPeople who note deaths from natural disasters and fervent unanswered prayers may have a hard time accepting this statement. However, we must understand here that in the scientific field seeing refers to all the convincing data that one can obtain through the sensory faculties and reason; while in religion it means recognition through intuition and deep conviction.

Website design By BotEap.comSome have suspected that it is due to some genetic coding. On the contrary, ardent religionists have analyzed the mentality of unbelievers. Their explanations are often quite simple: The deceived unbelievers have succumbed, they say, to the temptation of the devil or have fallen under the spell of some evil spirit; that the poor creatures have not yet received the Grace of God, or that the inability to sing the glories of God is a consequence of bad deeds perpetrated in past births.

Website design By BotEap.comMany positive things have arisen in human history both because of belief and doubt, that there have been great scientists and thinkers who have been men and women of deep faith, and many horrible acts have been committed in the name of Faith.

Website design By BotEap.comIn these cases, completely opposite effects have been produced. It does not seem to occur to either group that essentially they both share certain common characteristics: both are convinced beyond reasonable doubt that their own understanding of whatever may or may not be beyond the world of perceived reality is the correct, that there is an implicit arrogance in their attempts to analyze and explain the innermost beliefs of the opposite group, that if one is obsessed with explaining everything, the other confuses experiences of hopes, ecstasies and transcendental visions with physical reality.

Website design By BotEap.comThese are people who unsympathetically reject all religious narratives about the distant past or their forecasts about what is to come in the very distant future, much less about God and angels and such.

Website design By BotEap.comIn matters of the intellect, follow your reason as far as it leads, regardless of any consideration. Do not pretend that they are certain conclusions that are not proven or provable. Corporal punishment for bad deeds, however unfortunate, is understandable. But to burn fellow human beings at the stake, cut off their heads or mutilate their bodies because they had different notions of what constitutes God or the afterlife, without the perpetrators having the slightest evidence of the incontrovertible correctness of their own arguments: this is unbelievable to those who have advanced somewhat from the medieval mentality.

Website design By BotEap.comOne final thought, along with skeptical unbelievers who tend to think they are the only scientifically enlightened members of the human family, regard traditional believers as misguided, irrational, and worse, there really cannot be a healthy dialogue between the science and religion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *